— A statement regarding some ambiguous or undefined aspect of a work, the Word of God comes from someone considered to be the ultimate authority, such as the creator, director, or producer. Winmls 2004 Keygen. Such edicts can even go against events as were broadcast, due to someone making a mistake.
Fans may look for the Word of God to settle disputes, but the Authority may have moved on and. In many cases the authority does not feel the need to respond; further pressure simply leads to suggestions. Note that a number of people the notion of Word of God, considering something to be only if it appeared in the original source material, and that if the creator wanted a certain fact to be canon, they should have included it in the work to begin with. Some people go even further, considering the uncertainty and ambiguity of canon to be a good thing and decry the Word of God as shackling the imagination and interpretations of the fans — a belief supported by some modern literary criticism, notably in Wimsatt and Beardsley's 'The Intentional Fallacy' and Barthes' essay, both of which argue that the interpretation of a work cannot be limited to attempts to discern the 'author's intentions.' Something else to consider is that, often, particularly when it comes to comedy shows, creators may make statements that are meant as jokes, or at least, not meant to be taken seriously. It may sometimes be difficult for people to tell if certain creators are making a genuine statement of canon or not.
So, be careful when relying on things like humorous DVD commentaries and interviews on comedic talk shows for confirmation about something. Another thorny issue is that not all stories have a single creator, and the collaborators may not actually agree with interpretations of their story that weren't made explicit in the work.
This is especially likely if they no longer work together, and particularly if they had a real-life falling out. In this case, there are multiple 'Gods' given potentially contradictory explanations, so whose word is to be considered correct? Likewise, in many cases, meaning that they're not the highest authorities on its meaning even if you do subscribe to the Word of God theory.
If a work has more than one creator and they disagree with each other on a crucial point, you'll likely see fans embrace conflicting statements. What happens when multiple fans are equipped with the Word of God? What happens when one Word turns out to be more ridiculous than expected? The term ' is sometimes used for the definitive guidelines for writing an episode of a TV series. Two writers quoting the back and forth are having a Bible Fight.
This is also a way that a theory can be. It's important to remember that if you disagree with the Word of God, there's nothing wrong with writing, just don't try to foist your preferred on fans who acknowledge the official canon or on the actual creator of the work. Actors can be included under Word of God if they are the actual performers of the characters involved. This is because in order to perform their roles, most actors will spend time working out motivations, backstory, and even what a character is thinking in a particular scene.
No more missed important software updates! UpdateStar 11 lets you stay up to date and secure with the software on your computer.
So even if a scene does not actually have two characters say 'I love you' to each other, but the actors say that they played the roles as the two characters being in love, and the writer of the story says they were in love, then Word of God may then apply that they were in love. When the word does not come from the creator themself but from someone involved in some ancillary role in production, that's.
When the word does not come from the original creators but over time is still treated as such it is. Doesn't always end up giving fans the answers they were looking for, such as in the case of a or a. Cases of God deliberately misleading the audience go under. Is a subtrope. Contrast, and.
See also:,,, and. Not to be confused with actual scripture, which we have a whole for. • Note that Oda isn't above lying about certain things. He said Sabo was dead.. • In an interview in the volume of, Tsugumi Ohba expressly states that the random girl at the very end is not Misa Amane and is just stuck in there for the sake of something pretty.
Many actively ignore this for the sole reason that. • Ohba also states that s/he wanted it clear that dead characters are dead forever and can't come back to life. Sorry, guys,. • Other things Ohba and Obata are explicit about include the fact that L lies about Light being his friend, and that Light, while 'diabolical', genuinely loves his family and 'humanity as a whole'. You can imagine how this goes down with.
• However, in regards to L lying about Light being his friend, 'How to Read' also says on L's character page that 'Even while fighting him as an enemy, L establishes a weird friendship with Light.' In regards to that quote. So while the initial statement may have been a lie, it eventually became true.
• It also gives us the closest we're ever going to get to an official answer regarding Matsuda's theory that Near controlled Mikami with the Death Note: that readers are meant to draw their own conclusions. However, said book also mentions that Near is 'dishonest' and 'the more evil' of him and Mello. • In an interview about, Nanase Ohkawa, the script writer for, mentioned several times to the interviewer that and are now, despite the fact that not only are they mortal enemies, and while tension is apparent, they've stayed pretty firmly in 'good friends' territory, but Kamui is still enamored with his dead childhood friend, the (female) Kotori. She even told the interviewer not to call them friends, as if no one can figure out that CLAMP has a thing for sudden homosexual relationships.
• Masaki Kajishima, the original creator of and the main writer for the Ryo-Oh-Ki (even called 'Kajishima canon' in Japan), is very fond of releasing tie-in novels, factbooks, doujinshis and other infodumps, where he explains his in more depth — mainly because he couldn't readily obtain funding for the next series, but still has something to say. These infodumps are generally treated as canon by Japanese fans, but tend not to appear in the West. Basically, these are the things that Kajishima will make canon if/when the copyright holder (AIC) greenlights more OVAs. Until then, he's left in the unusual circumstance of essentially writing fanfic about his own anime. • creator Kouta Hirano grew tired of fielding questions from detail obsessed fans about Alucard never being shown reloading his guns and where Anderson kept all of his bayonets in the manga.
He got around this in a Q&A by saying that 'they're all cosmoguns that hold a million rounds' and 'Anderson is four dimensional'. •: • Occasionally he has interviews in the sections of the compiled volumes where he sometimes clears up questions unanswered in the actual manga, such as the specifics of the pactio system, or how Kaede carries her around.
• He also tends to update his Twitter account and online journal to point out errors in the chapters (from important points such as one character's element being labeled Ice instead of Water by mistake to trivial matters such as one character being shaded incorrectly), among other things. • George Morikawa, the author of, named the top three boxers in chapter 361 of the manga. The strongest pound-for-pound boxer is, without a doubt, Takamura. Ranking second is Ricardo Martinez.
Surprisingly, he names Miyata as the third best boxer and Ippo around the 8th place. •: During an answered questions from fans and, among other things, has claimed that Kamina is a virgin, Simon isn't, and Viral is a shark with feline genetics. • author Akira Toriyama has provided a fair bit of information in interview sections of guide books ranging from the structure of the afterlife to Saiyan biology.
• creator stated in an artbook that the only reason Roy Mustang and Riza Hawkeye aren't married is because of the military regulations. This was implied to be the only reason, effectively validating fans' theories of their romantic involvement. • The creator of, Yoshihiro Togashi, has stated that Sensui and Itsuki are a gay male couple. He experiences as much backlash as he does because the only open affection shown is on Itsuki's part.
• 's director and scriptwriter have given dozens of tidbits about events and characters, from trivial (Keith's a bit of a health nut and Antonio's afraid of heights) to rather serious (Kotetsu's stems from a fear of hurting people he developed after gaining his powers, and Maverick has screwed with Barnaby's memories quite a bit more than what was shown in the series). The Hero Gossip Book gives even more info — from their pajamas to first crushes to everyone's daily schedules. • 's creator Suzy Spafford has confirmed that the Little Suzy's Zoo takes place in the main Suzy's Zoo universe. Kansas Fake Id Template on this page. She has also confirmed that Witzy is the little cousin of Jack Quackers, one of the main protagonists of the main Suzy's Zoo. • A Wizard magazine interview with then-current writer and artist George Perez asked each one to convey a factoid that nobody else could provide. The contrast is striking: Busiek went for; Perez revealed that.
• Brian Clevinger himself came onto to deliver a Word of God in regards to. • Gerry Conway said in this podcast interview (about 34 minutes in) ( that Gwen Stacy was killed because John Romita Sr. Wanted to shake up Spider-Man by killing off a major character.
Romita wanted to kill off Aunt May but Conway suggested killing Gwen because he thought she was a fairly standard superhero love interest and thought Mary Jane would make a more interesting love interest. • On December 15, 2010, creator posted the following tweet: 'I herewith proclaim, for the world to see, that J. Jonah Jameson’s first name is — Jeremiah! And so it shall remain—till I change my mind!'
(Although this does seem a bit contradictory, however; while Jameson never actually confirmed that his name was 'John' in the comic, almost everyone assumed that it was, due to the fact it is the name of both his father and son.) • Speaking of Stan Lee and J. Jonah Jameson, Lee has also admitted on Talk of the Nation that the character was designed as a grouchier caricature of himself, and has also said that he would have jumped on the opportunity to portray him in a movie. • There's three things is particularly known for:, his love of readers, and this. For example, Bendis responded to reader revolt over his poor characterization of by stating on his Tumblr that her experiences on changed her (rather than addressing it on-panel), claiming that altered his plans for (and that the deviations in a second battle with the future brotherhood ), or confirming that the time travel ending of the Will arc of Uncanny X-Men would not remove Xavier, Jr. From the timeline. And his Word Of God statements frequently get snarky, especially when combined with his love of trolling the readers or when responding to criticism. • that all the characters held hostage by Telos regained their lost lives.
• The author of, ThatPersonYouMightKnow, has confirmed many things on the fan forum that pertain to the series. Here are some notable examples: • Tama and Tojo both went to heaven after dying, despite their sinister actions.
• The Interceptor became the pride's best hunter after The End. • Haiba never entered a proper relationship when he grew up. • Haiba did eventually get over murdering Tama. • The fan nickname Anti-Haiba was accepted as canon. • Rafiki existed, hence why he is occasionally referenced, but ThatPersonYouMightKnow has confirmed that he died after Series 3. • Twiga, the giraffe from Haiba's Wish, is in fact gay. • The author of uses Author's Notes often to elaborate about facts in the story, and is always happy to give.
• Sometimes used in to address matters such as Nanoha's reactions to her past life as Serenity, and how four Inner Senshi are able to defeat six trained Bureau operatives despite being less well-trained and not having Usagi/Nanoha's leadership. • The character's corner and author's note in have both clarified a few things, such as reasons for making one thing the way it is. Also, through private messaging, cuttingmoon57 revealed him/herself to be a fan of.
• Monica Gilbey-Bieber, the author of the, has a commentary of his own fanfic in. The commentary reveals interesting bits and trivia about the fanfic. • In, the author notes detail information about things such as how characters (both the canon characters and ) are portrayed, some of what the author hoped to get across, and various other information, such as the fact that. • gives bits of trivia on her profile page, on her blog and in author notes. One reference in gets the award for most notable because there's an asterisk sitting in the middle of the fic.
• has an 'Author's Notes' section at the end of each chapter that explains various things (e.g. Why the USS Bajor has more than the Enterprise-D ever did, that Tess Phohl is an agnostic despite her, and why Section 31 Agent Grell is tolerated). The author has also posted a number of characters' backstories on the fanon wiki Memory Gamma. Later did the same thing with another fic,. • The author of keeps updates on his works and answers questions about the story.
He also has explained many parts of the backstory and fleshed out the setting, and he has explained his reasoning for rewriting his story. • The author of has given bits and pieces of her characters' relationships and background information about Monsters University as well as the Monster World, which can be found.
• has been very clear in interviews in stating that, in his film, Deckard himself was a replicant. The only clues that this might be true in the movie, though, are the fact that Deckard's eyes briefly luminesce in one shot (and he's out of focus and in the background, at that) and the origami unicorn left by Gaff (Edward James Olmos) after Deckard dreamed of a unicorn. Unfortunately for anyone who saw the film in theaters and was trying to add up the clues, the unicorn dream was one of the victims of the that the film underwent after leaving Scott's hands. The final half of a line by Gaff at the end of the film ('You've done a man's job sir. But are you a man?'
), which raises the issue even if it fails to resolve it, was also cut. (It appears in its entirety in 'Dangerous Days,' the documentary about the making of the film in the 5-disc Final Cut collector's edition.) • This is also a very good example of a deeply conflicted idea among the core creative team, as nearly everybody else involved with the making of the film believed that Deckard is a human, albeit one whose humanity has been ground down by the nature of his job. From Philip K. Dick (who wrote the original novel), to Hampton Fancher and David Peoples (who wrote the screenplay), to Harrison Ford (who played Deckard), the list of people who thought Scott was wrong is extensive, and powerful enough in creative terms to give Auteur Theory advocates a headache. It was hardly the only case of duelling during the filming; the scene where Deckard essentially forces Rachael to kiss him (with all its squicky undertones) was another case where the screenwriters (and Rutger Hauer, who played Roy Batty) deeply disagreed with Scott's take on the material. It's very possible that the conflicts are what make the film such a Cult hit: whatever your take on the film, it's likely there was someone involved in making it who shared that view, simultaneously vindicating your reading and providing lots and lots to debate about with other fans.
• Ridley Scott again; is a madman? While most, including Anthony Hopkins, would not deny it, Scott does not think so. In Scott's own words in his audio commentary on, 'There is something very moral about Lecter in this film. The behavior of Hannibal is never insane – [I] didn't want to use that excuse.
Is he insane? No, I think he's as sane as you or I. He just likes it.' Having said that, Scott went on to say that he did think that Verger's objective in the film, wanting to capture Hannibal and subject him to a horrible death by torture, likely made him replace Hannibal as the true antagonist. • In the introductory documentary from the VHS Special Edition of: (as well as an interview for The Mythology of Star Wars with George Lucas and Bill Moyers) George Lucas stomped on the idea that 'bringing balance to the Force' involved equalising the Light and Dark sides — apparently, the Dark Side is inherently an imbalance.
Wookieepedia has the relevant quotes in their article on the. • Any throwaway comment by George Lucas pertaining to the original two trilogies is accepted as canon, regardless of how ridiculous it is. See: Admiral Motti's first name and the true home world of Obi-Wan Kenobi. • Toho has stated that won in both the American and Japanese versions of. • left it ambiguous whether the fairy tale stuff was real or all in Ophelia's head, as if it was intentionally open to interpretation and left for the viewer to decide. However in the DVD commentary, the director Guilermo Del Toro says that it was real, or at least that he believes it is.
• The original leaves it ambiguous whether Arnold Schwarzenegger's character actually is having the adventure, or he is hallucinating as his brain is being fried by a memory-implantation malfunction. The fact that the film ends with a fade to white instead of black suggests it's a hallucination, and Paul Verhoeven confirms this in the commentary; Arnold Schwarzenegger played the part using the assumption that it was real. • In, it's implied that Mr. Brooks' daughter killed a man and hid it from him, but it was off screen and never shown. We never find out definitively whether she did it or not, and some viewers don't accept that she did. However, the DVD commentary says definitively that she did. • In, though it's not actually explicitly stated, Harvey Dent/Two Face is, according to,.
Additionally, the screenplay explicitly states that Harvey/Two Face 'dies from a broken neck'. Even if it’s a case of two separate personalities, that still doesn’t allow Harvey to die and Two-Face to live. • has also mentioned in interviews that he asked Nolan if Harvey Dent/Two Face was dead. Nolan confirmed it to Eckhart. • The director of the 2008 had a rare chance on the DVD commentary to fully explain a cliffhanger ending, as he himself doesn't know whether Bruce has turned evil: if his next appearance is in the Avengers film he has, and if it's another Hulk film he hasn't. • Since has hit the theaters this situation can be solved: Although there is a lot of tension in the beginning and everybody treads very carefully around the Hulk, he is part of the team and drives into the sunset with Tony Stark.
• This is the reason that the Wachowskis refuse to talk about their own interpretation of the; in the introduction they wrote for the Ultimate Matrix Collection, they state that they don't want their own opinions to be cited as definitive, since the blind acceptance of dogma flies in the face of the trilogy's themes. It was initially stated by the creators that Michael burned to death. However, they were forced to retcon this in due to poor reception of. • includes a special feature called the Fuzz-o-Meter, which pops up bits of trivia about the film. Much of the trivia includes bits and pieces about the story or characters that had been written into the script, but never made it to film. One of the 'facts' claims that the film was inspired by true events, only they involved zombies. • Another 'fact' states that director Edgar Wright's eyeballs exploded during post-production.
• In, the commentaries have answered a few unanswered questions, specifically in, in which the writers have stated that Hoffman does not escape the bathroom and dies there, and that the two pig masks who helped Dr. Gordon capture him are Brad and Ryan from the opening.
• For the series, there has been a bit of debate (particularly by a stubborn wikipedia admin) as to whether Jason is dead after being completely incinerated in Earth 2's atmosphere (except for his mask) at the end of. Though a comic and a novel series retcons this, most Jason comics fit into, and it's Word of God that Jason is listed under the Jump to Death menu on the official DVD, with 'Atmosphere' even listed as cause of death. • During the dubbing process of Soundwave's English voice actor () was brought on to dub the character for the French and Italian versions (amongst others, sans Japanese and German *Considered to be sub-standard*),. • On the DVD commentary of ', the actors mention that according to the writer/director Maya does not live there any more when Miles knocks on her door. • During the filming of, had the costumers sew a pocket into his robe in which he, for use in settling debates about the author's intent.
• Writer Parker Bennett of the film clarified many details about the universe's backstory in a 2010 interview with The Super Mario Bros. The Movie Archive website. • For years, viewers of have wondered know each other and became. Bob Gale, the co-creator of the movies, FINALLY gave a explanation (later confirming with a photograph that yes, he IS the real deal!). •: The director says that the spiders seen from the beginning to symbolize femininity. What that in turn means. • For, However, the executives refused, so original stage writer and film screenwriter James Lapine then rewrote the fate of Rapunzel and toned down darker aspects of her character, and a new song 'She'll Be Back' was written for the Witch to sing after Rapunzel leaves with her Prince (it was later cut and will be on the Blu-ray release).
• Much of the information regarding what happens to the characters after the end of has come from interviews with, or postings on Many of the interviews are archived on. Rowling is also writing a encyclopedia which will contain background information which never made it into the novels, thus turning into when it's published. • The strength of in the Harry Potter fandom seems unusual compared to many other literature fandoms, possibly because of the sheer amount of interview material given by Rowling. The massive success of the series made her very powerful, to the point that most people in the fandom have read a great number of interviews, and everything she says gets archived and treated as gospel truth (even though she sometimes contradicts herself or changes things later on).
It's nearly impossible to find a Harry Potter roleplay or fandom community that doesn't treat interview material as equally important as the content of the actual series, and individuals who try to theorize about or play characters based solely on the book content will find themselves attacked for not knowing enough about the character. • JK Rowling loves giving Word of God so much that she is apparently launching a just to give her fans some more. • However, her claim about Dumbledore's sexuality could be an exception: a large part of both fandom refuses to accept it, since it heavily changes the understanding of some of the character's motives and doesn't fit into their mental image of Dumbledore. • Notably, some fans want J.K to stop giving out information, because there's a point where it feels like the answers weren't intended for the canon and are only being given because they're requested., who firmly believes in has said that he disagrees with Rowling's abundance of out-of-text information.
• David Weber, writer of (among other things) the series, occasionally makes proclamations on points of confusion by fans, on the newsgroup featuring him (alt.books.david-weber) and the, a forum maintained by, the publisher of many and works. These are occasionally collected, and posted for perusal by those not reading the forums and/or newsgroup, maintained by Joe Buckley (who's a regular in various Baen-published novels; has had several Buckleys killed in and of itself). • has that he intended Silas from to be a vampire.
On the other hand, he also said •, writer of part of the, in his posits what he thinks happened to his characters in the twenty or so years between Wraith Squadron and the Vong War, as well as some details that never made it into the books, like ship names. • parodied the controversy over the canonicity of J.K. Rowling's for Dumbledore by posting a list of facts about the protagonist of on and declaring them canonical. They included 'He is allergic to blueberries' and 'He is distantly related to '.